Breaking |

Breaking |

Cal HC leaves it to state, SEC to decide on security
Published : May 10, 2018, 5:51 pm IST
Updated : May 10, 2018, 5:51 pm IST
SHARE ARTICLE
Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court today left it to the West Bengal government and State Election Commission to decide on security requirements...

The Calcutta High Court today left it to the West Bengal government and State Election Commission to decide on security requirements for panchayat election in the state, expressing hope that it would be held in a free, fair and peaceful manner. A division bench comprising Chief Justice J Bhattacharya and Justice A Banerjee did not specify the date for holding the election, which the SEC had fixed on May 14. A single bench had earlier said that the date of May 14 for holding the elections, as announced by the SEC, could be regarded as tentative and not final. It had said that the division bench presided by the chief justice would decide on the date of election after the state and the SEC submit reports on security arrangements for holding the polls. Taking note of the reports submitted on security arrangements, the division bench said that the court was not in a position to assess security and it was for the administration and SEC to decide on it. Observing that maintenance of law and order was a state subject, the bench left it to the West Bengal government to take a call on the requirements. It also noted that the SEC had expressed its satisfaction over the security arrangements as "adequate and satisfactory".

The bench, however, directed that if there was violence during the election and the loss of life and property was higher than in the previous panchayat election in the state in 2013, compensation would be paid to the next of kin and affected people from the salaries of responsible officers of the state. Petitioners before the court had prayed for deployment of central forces for conducting the rural polls and had also sought compensation in case of loss of lives and destruction of property. The state had told the court that it had enough armed forces to hold the elections and that there was no need to call in central paramilitary forces for the purpose. In 2013 central paramilitary forces had been deployed along with state forces for holding the panchayat elections in the state. Another division bench presided by Justice B Somadder is hearing an appeal over the SEC's decision to hold the election in a single phase, while it had earlier announced a three-phase election. Appellants CPI(M) and PDS, both opposition parties in the state, claimed that the commission had not followed a single bench order of holding a meaningful discussion with stakeholders before announcing the date/dates for the election.

SHARE ARTICLE

PTI

Advertisement
Advertisement

The shopkeeper had promised to sell shirts for just Rs 13 each, but seeing the huge crowd, he ran away to save his life.

05 Nov 2025 7:26 PM

\'PU is conducting a witchcraft diploma\', eye-opening interview with Pyare Lal Garg

05 Nov 2025 7:23 PM

Brazilian model casts vote 22 times in Haryana, 500 votes were cast in the name of one person at the same address

05 Nov 2025 7:13 PM

41 Years After 1984 Sikh Riots: PM Narendra Modi\'s big statement on 1984 Sikh Genocide | Sikh Riots

02 Nov 2025 6:10 PM

Jaggu Bhagwanpuria Lawyer Byte: Hear from Jaggu Bhagwanpuria\'s lawyer how many days of remand did he get?

02 Nov 2025 6:08 PM

Punjab news: Donkey route-path of death; Kaithal youth killed by donkey drivers

31 Oct 2025 7:22 PM
Advertisement