
New Delhi: Actor Ranveer Singh says he felt pushed against the wall with the many roadblocks ahead of the release of "Padmaavat" and its long gestation period, a rage that propelled his portrayal of Alauddin Khilji in the film.
The film, which released on January 25 with multiple
disclaimers following nationwide protests, found itself in
trouble from the very beginning with its sets being vandalised
twice in Rajasthan and Maharashtra.
"There was a lot of anxiety surrounding the shooting.
Whatever untoward incident happened, it made me very, very
angry. Ever since the first incident on the sets... I was
raging from inside. But I chose not to act out in a
destructive way. I channeled it and used it constructively.
I put it into my performance," the actor told PTI in an
interview.
The much-debated film is already a blockbuster and
Ranveer's portrayal of Khilji has been singled out for
particular praise. More than happiness, however, Ranveer says
he feels a sense of relief.
The costume drama was not easy to shoot, says the star.
The many delays led to the film being shot in almost one go --
in 40 plus days.
"Apart from what was happening, the actual shooting
process was difficult due to the delays. I was shooting for
more than 40 days straight, which is unheard of in a costume
drama, especially on a Sanjay Leela Bhansali film. It is
draining at every level, physically mentally, emotionally."
In his previous collaborations with Bhansali, there would
be a break every six to eight days so that the crew could
recuperate but that was not the option this time.
"My brain had turned into mush, my body had turned into
pulp, I had no feeling in my muscles. I kept pushing but
physically, I was breaking. But when you have your back
against the wall, you need to keep digging deeper. It was the
angst that kept me going."
Constantly being in character took its toll on Ranveer.
The darkness of the character, he says, started to creep up on
him, a feeling so intense that he lost touch with himself for
a while. "I try to be as honest to my craft as I can possibly be.
The dark person that Khilji was, I had to become that from the
inside. I had to feel all those things and that can be
unhealthy. The shooting process was non-stop. I would put on
the make-up for two hours and shoot for 12-14 hours straight
and repeat it the next day.
"I lost touch with myself. I realised that something was
wrong. I had become uneasy, unstable. So I first confided in
my mother and my best friend. They started spending time with
me after the shoot. They brought me back to myself. I was
lucky to have that kind of support."
While the release of "Padmaavat" was stalled by Rajput
groups over the portrayal of queen Padmavati, post-release,
the film has attracted criticism in certain quarters over the
unidimensional portrayal of Khilji as an evil, imbalanced
ruler, which some historians say is inaccurate.
Asked whether Khilji's extremism was over-hyped, Ranveer
said he moulded himself to Bhansali's vision of the character.
"As an actor, I need to be honest with the script. I used
the script as my textbook. For the most part, I take my cues
from what is written. The character that Mr Bhansali and
Prakash Kapadia created, I tried to do the best I could with
it.
"In fact, I wanted to make Khilji darker and even more of
an extremist. Mr Bhansali really moulded me this time. In
'Bajirao', he allowed me to interpret but this time he was
hands-on. I built on what was written and how he directed me."
The other criticism against the film is over the 'jauhar'
(mass sati) scene towards the end, which many feel glorifies
the practice. Actor Swara Bhasker has written a scathing
letter to Bhansali criticising the scene.
But Ranveer sidestepped the issue and said, "I got a
message from Swara just yesterday. She loved my performance
in the film. So..."
The actor, who has collaborated with Bhansali for the
third time after "Ram-Leela" and "Bajirao Mastani", says the
praise for "Padmaavat" is sweeter as he was not sure Khilji
would be accepted.
"I feel like I am walking on clouds. There were enough
people who were advising me to be careful. It is scary to take
on a part like this. It is such a big risk that it can be your
undoing. But I went with Mr Bhansali's conviction and gave my
whole and soul to this part. I am just relieved that my risk
has paid such dividends."
There is a running joke between them where he calls
Bhansali (Martin) Scorsese to his (Robert) De Niro.
"It is all in jest, we are not actually comparing but we
joke about it. He is quite brutal when I am not getting a
scene right and equally effusive with praise when I get it
right. I have been his leading man in three back-to-back
films. It is a big deal and like a major acquisition. He is
very special and dear to me.
PTI